The Conjuring 2
It's only a tent at the top of the stairs, where's the harm?

After watching the superb The Conjuring, and knowing The Conjuring universe is five films in, I sat down to watch The Conjuring 2 knowing that its reputation gave the impression it was just as good as the first. I was interested to find out.
From IMDB: In 1977, paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren travel to London, England, where single mother Peggy Hodgson believes that something evil is in her home. When Peggy's youngest daughter starts showing signs of demonic possession, Ed and Lorraine attempt to help the besieged girl, only to find themselves targeted by the malicious spirits.
Like its predecessor, The Conjuring 2 is based on real life events, this time being the Enfield Hauntings. Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson are back as Lorraine and Ed Warren as they try to help Peggy Hodgson attempting to cope with four terrified children.

The difficulty the writers must have had in addressing a sequel was how to avoid making The Conjuring all over again but not as good, because sequels rarely are as good especially if the idea is basically the same. There are many similarities in the set up between the two films, a family move into a house which turns out to be haunted and, slowly but surely, strange things start to happen. There are creepy kids, a menacing old man, slamming doors, shadows that move, is there something under the bed? Was that door open earlier? What’s that in the back ground? But once again, all these staple ideas underpinned the narrative rather than be the narrative and a highlight was the child’s tent at the top of the stairs. Very relatable.
Although this may seem like the same film, its setting gave the film a fresh feel. The suburbs of London was a refreshing change to the isolated house, the building in the middle of nowhere. This was a three bedroom semi in the middle of a housing estate and most of us can relate to that. There was a deliciously sinister atmosphere running through its run time and the 70s retro look was captured beautifully with the film makers paying respectful homage to actual events in 1977.

I did find The Conjuring 2 to be a little baggy. It’s half an hour longer than its predecessor and I felt it would’ve been a tighter affair if it came in at around a similar length to The Conjuring. The Crooked Man, although an excellent idea, let the film down with its cartoonish look and took me out of the film if only for a few minutes. There was probably too much time spent with Vera and Patrick at their home, but at the same time this gave the characters time to breathe because we found out about the mental fragility of Lorraine Warren. The foreshadowing of the Annabelle doll was a nice touch and their room of haunted artefacts was an interesting concept and reminded me of 1974’s From Beyond The Grave. It also gives Warner Brothers license to churn out these types of horror films for years to come, choosing one artefact and throwing together a 90 minute movie about its back story. One word on the Demon Nun, I found her quite amusing and not really scary at all. I think it was the concept of a Demon Nun that I couldn’t overcome. Thankfully, her screen time was kept to a minimum although I’m not looking forward to the latest movie in this franchise which is simply called, The Nun.

These are minor gripes however, because all the way through there was great peril, the child actors were superb, especially Madison Wolfe who played the possessed Janet Hodgson, and there were moments that stayed with me a while after the film had finished, for example, billy, the truck and the tent. There’s not much to choose between the two films because I felt the location of The Conjuring 2 made up for the film’s flaws and, in the end, I enjoyed both film very much the same. 80/100


For some reason I thought I had already seen this Hammer Horror classic and maybe I had when I was younger but I could not recall the opening scenes suggesting I had not. I recognised imagery from the film thanks to trailers, clips and segments in Iron Maiden videos; perhaps this was the cause of my mistake. My expectations were high when hitting play as some, especially in the British Horror Group I am a member of, herald it as peak Hammer with the great Christopher Lee often siting The Devil Rides Out as his favourite Hammer film. It had a lot to live up to, however, invariably such films fail to deliver due to unmeetable expectations, but Christopher Lee, Devil worship, Charles Gray, directed by the great Terence Fisher…what could go wrong?
First of all, it was lovely to see Christopher Lee starring as the protagonist, not the action type, that was the job of Leon Greene, but as the wise council and voice of reason, no wonder it was Lee’s favourite Hammer film, he got the chance to play a good guy for once.
The film doesn’t hang about, as soon as Leone Green lands his plane and is met by Christopher Lee. He asks about someone called Simon and within a few lines of dialogue we’re at Simon’s new house because they’re worried about him and hadn’t seen him for at least three months. My first thought was he’d met a girl or taken a new job but it turns out he’s having a dinner party and hob nobbing with a group of new friends from an astronomical society. Of course, Christopher Lee suspects they’re all devil worshippers ready to sacrifice chickens. For me, it was a stretch for him to conclude this within the first nine minutes of the film and I wish more time was given for his suspicions to embed. A general decline in Simon’s behaviour perhaps or more clues gathered to Simon’s new ‘hobby’, it all happened a little too quickly, especially as Simon’s behaviour is quite pleasant and not sinister at all. Simon’s bought a new house, I’ve not seen him in three months that means he’s dealing in black magic. Simon insists Greene and Lee leave (this would make more than thirteen at the party and thus unable to perform the ritual) but Lee punches Simon’s lights out instead before kidnapping him and slugging the butler at the same time, it was all a little clunky for me.







