The Conjuring 2
It's only a tent at the top of the stairs, where's the harm?

After watching the superb The Conjuring, and knowing The Conjuring universe is five films in, I sat down to watch The Conjuring 2 knowing that its reputation gave the impression it was just as good as the first. I was interested to find out.
From IMDB: In 1977, paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren travel to London, England, where single mother Peggy Hodgson believes that something evil is in her home. When Peggy's youngest daughter starts showing signs of demonic possession, Ed and Lorraine attempt to help the besieged girl, only to find themselves targeted by the malicious spirits.
Like its predecessor, The Conjuring 2 is based on real life events, this time being the Enfield Hauntings. Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson are back as Lorraine and Ed Warren as they try to help Peggy Hodgson attempting to cope with four terrified children.

The difficulty the writers must have had in addressing a sequel was how to avoid making The Conjuring all over again but not as good, because sequels rarely are as good especially if the idea is basically the same. There are many similarities in the set up between the two films, a family move into a house which turns out to be haunted and, slowly but surely, strange things start to happen. There are creepy kids, a menacing old man, slamming doors, shadows that move, is there something under the bed? Was that door open earlier? What’s that in the back ground? But once again, all these staple ideas underpinned the narrative rather than be the narrative and a highlight was the child’s tent at the top of the stairs. Very relatable.
Although this may seem like the same film, its setting gave the film a fresh feel. The suburbs of London was a refreshing change to the isolated house, the building in the middle of nowhere. This was a three bedroom semi in the middle of a housing estate and most of us can relate to that. There was a deliciously sinister atmosphere running through its run time and the 70s retro look was captured beautifully with the film makers paying respectful homage to actual events in 1977.

I did find The Conjuring 2 to be a little baggy. It’s half an hour longer than its predecessor and I felt it would’ve been a tighter affair if it came in at around a similar length to The Conjuring. The Crooked Man, although an excellent idea, let the film down with its cartoonish look and took me out of the film if only for a few minutes. There was probably too much time spent with Vera and Patrick at their home, but at the same time this gave the characters time to breathe because we found out about the mental fragility of Lorraine Warren. The foreshadowing of the Annabelle doll was a nice touch and their room of haunted artefacts was an interesting concept and reminded me of 1974’s From Beyond The Grave. It also gives Warner Brothers license to churn out these types of horror films for years to come, choosing one artefact and throwing together a 90 minute movie about its back story. One word on the Demon Nun, I found her quite amusing and not really scary at all. I think it was the concept of a Demon Nun that I couldn’t overcome. Thankfully, her screen time was kept to a minimum although I’m not looking forward to the latest movie in this franchise which is simply called, The Nun.

These are minor gripes however, because all the way through there was great peril, the child actors were superb, especially Madison Wolfe who played the possessed Janet Hodgson, and there were moments that stayed with me a while after the film had finished, for example, billy, the truck and the tent. There’s not much to choose between the two films because I felt the location of The Conjuring 2 made up for the film’s flaws and, in the end, I enjoyed both film very much the same. 80/100









